In recent years, Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) have gained in popularity as a way for companies to raise capital to fuel expansion and future growth.
Sometimes compared to a “kickstarter” or crowdfunding campaign, ICOs involve companies offering tokens or “coins” that can confer different types of value and benefits to their owners.
Tokens are typically divided into two categories:
For example, in order to use our partner network SelfKey’s Marketplace, you would need to buy KEY tokens, which are then used to pay the fees for services such as opening a bank account or incorporating an offshore company through safe transactions on the blockchain. KEY is therefore considered a Utility token. It does not confer ownership of anything; it is a coupon that is bought and then used for a service.
Security tokens are different to utility tokens in a number of ways. First, they are usually tied to an existing asset, such as a company. They also confer ownership, through some kind of pre-established contractual agreement between the buyer and the seller. While their value may fluctuate according to the laws of supply and demand, their value should also in theory increase or decrease according to the underlying value of the asset they confer ownership over.
Most importantly for the scope of this article, many regulators around the world are now beginning to treat all tokens offered through ICOs as securities. This is critical from a regulatory standpoint, as dealing in securities involves complying with complex regulations designed to minimize the risk of fraud and money laundering that is all too common in securities trading.
Therefore, any company that seeks to issue a security token will need to ensure they are complying with the regulations governing this type of asset class in the jurisdictions whose laws they are subject to. And it’s also important to remember that although you may consider your token to be a utility and not a security, that doesn’t mean that regulators will take the same view.
Is KYC Compliance that Important for an ICO?
We regularly discuss the impact of expanding regulatory frameworks, such as the FATF Travel Rule, on Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and how they will need to conduct business in the future.
When it comes to ICOs, the need for compliance - and the forms it has to take - is hard to generalize, as they can vary significantly from one jurisdiction to the next.
Indeed, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ruled in 2018 that although Bitcoin and Ethereum were not securities (principally due to their lack of a centralized, controlling organization), tokens offered in ICOs were most likely to fall under the definition of a security, and its own guidelines on ICOs also leave a lot of room for interpretation on what will be treated as a security under U.S. law.
As a result of the legal ambiguity surrounding ICOs - and the likelihood that regulations will become tighter and more coherent in the future - the general and widely-recommended option is to err on the side of caution and to voluntarily ensure that diligent Know Your Customer (KYC) processes are in place and part of a robust Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocol.
However, employing teams of legal and compliance professionals to manually vet every potential investor or purchaser of a coin in an ICO is not really an option for any company, let alone a startup seeking funding to get off the ground.
This is where automated KYC software like KYC-Chain can make all the difference. Here’s how it can help:
Financial regulators are constantly expanding and evolving the laws VASPs are subject to, and many in the world’s larger markets are leaning towards classifying all tokens offered in ICOs as securities. As such, it makes sense to have the right KYC/AML measures in place, even if they are not yet definitively required.
Understanding who purchases a token is important for being able to track what happens to the token in the future. Some countries, such as the U.S., have rules governing the amount of time required for a security to be held before it can be sold again, so knowing who your customers are and where they are located is critical for remaining compliant.
Most banks will want to have clear and verified information on sources of funds. By implementing a robust KYC procedure during your ICO, you’ll be better equipped to prove your funds were generated from legitimate sources, and that they have not been used for money laundering or other illicit activities.
Using a risk-based approach, you can use KYC-Chain to segregate low risk from high risk customers, funneling the latter into more rigorous screening processes and Enhanced Due Diligence techniques.
While there is a common misconception that KYC processes can have the effect of discouraging certain potential customers from finalizing their purchase, the reality is that most people and institutions feel safer doing business with companies that demonstrate they take security and compliance seriously.
As KYC-Chain is built to factor in a wide variety of different jurisdictional regulatory frameworks, integrating the technology as your KYC tool will provide expanded access to potential customers and investors across the world while ensuring compliance with each jurisdiction's legal regimes.
Choosing the Right ID Verification Provider for your KYC
When selecting a KYC provider for your token sale, there are some key points to take into consideration for ensuring that the technology and services they offer are what you need. Asking the following questions will help you build a clearer picture of the quality and scope of the KYC technology on offer, and whether it will suit the specific requirements and dynamics of your ICO:
Have any questions on how to use KYC-Chain for your upcoming ICO? Get in touch and we’ll be happy to arrange a demo.